[bv-dev] Support DI within constraint validators

[Emmanuel Bernard]

I'm sure there will be a next call soon, bring me in and we can discuss the issue at large :)

On 22 août 2012, at 14:37, Pete Muir wrote:

> Can you sync with Linda or Bill direct, as it really was just mutterings as you weren't on the call ;-)
> 
> On 22 Aug 2012, at 13:34, Emmanuel Bernard wrote:
> 
>> Of of the options is to have it defaulted to enabled. To disable validation or change the default group, @MethodValidated would be necessary.
>> Is that what the EE spec leads had in mind?
>> 
>> On 22 août 2012, at 13:23, Pete Muir wrote:
>> 
>>> BTW the Java EE spec leads were concerned about the @MethodValidated annotation being required at all.
>>> 
>>> On 22 Aug 2012, at 12:19, Emmanuel Bernard wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Yes, one of the consequences as you point out is that we will define the @MethodValidated contract in BV.
>>>> While I think it's a good thing, I want everyone to understand this consequence.
>>>> 
>>>> On 15 août 2012, at 22:56, Gunnar Morling wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>> 
>>>>> based on an issue I recently filed, CDI lead Pete Muir started a
>>>>> thread on the integration of BV and CDI over on the CDI mailing list
>>>>> [1].
>>>>> 
>>>>> The general question is where this integration should be described. My
>>>>> first assumption was, that the Java EE platform spec. would be the
>>>>> right place for this is, but Java EE co-lead Bill Shannon pointed out
>>>>> [2] that the preferred approach is to have such integrations described
>>>>> in one of the involved technology specs.
>>>>> 
>>>>> And actually we're already doing this to some degree as of the BV 1.1
>>>>> early draft [3]. So I guess our descriptions there need just to be a
>>>>> bit more authoritative ("must" instead of "should" etc.) and specific.
>>>>> In section 3.7, the CDI spec. currently also mentions built-in beans
>>>>> for Validator and ValidatorFactory to be provided by a Java EE
>>>>> container. To consolidate the specs I tend to think that this section
>>>>> should be merged into BV section 5.5.7.1.
>>>>> 
>>>>> The same approach should probably also be taken for the description of
>>>>> triggering method validation under Java EE using the @MethodValidated
>>>>> annotation.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Any thoughts?
>>>>> 
>>>>> --Gunnar
>>>>> 
>>>>> [1] http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/cdi-dev/2012-August/001978.html
>>>>> [2] http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/cdi-dev/2012-August/002045.html
>>>>> [3] http://beanvalidation.org/1.1/spec/#d0e6698
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> beanvalidation-dev mailing list
>>>>> beanvalidation-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>