[bv-dev] Ctor Validation
Edward Burns
edward.burns at oracle.com
Fri Jan 27 09:00:17 EST 2012
>>>>> On Thu, 1 Dec 2011 21:34:23 +0100, Gunnar Morling <gunnar.morling at googlemail.com> said:
GM> I see your point. I think we should only provide the API for this. How
GM> or for which objects constructor validation is enabled should be
GM> decided by users and/or solutions integrating with BV from my point of
GM> view.
>>>>> On Thu, 1 Dec 2011 23:53:29 +0100, Emmanuel Bernard <emmanuel at hibernate.org> said:
EB> Yes. That concerns me a bit to be honest especially when more
EB> technologies will offer BV integrations. We need to think this
EB> through before opening pandora's box even more :)
I'm familiar with the difficulties of tackling pandora's box type
issues, and my vote would be to simply not open it during this release,
instead, focusing on resolving the method level validation issue.
Ed
--
| edward.burns at oracle.com | office: +1 407 458 0017
| homepage: | http://ridingthecrest.com/
More information about the beanvalidation-dev
mailing list