[bv-dev] Method validation - cont'd

[Gunnar Morling]

2012/5/15 Emmanuel Bernard <emmanuel at hibernate.org>:
>
> On 14 mai 2012, at 20:24, Gunnar Morling wrote:
>
>>>> * Should ParameterNameProvider go into a sub-package?
>>
>>> which one do you have in mind there?
>>
>> Normally I'd lean towards to javax.validation.spi, since PNP is
>> something which is implemented by clients. But I think in BV 1.0, the
>> "spi" package is centered more around bootstrapping.
>>
>> So personally I'd be fine with leaving PNP directly within javax.validation.
>>
>> Emmanuel, I think you originally raised the idea of putting it into a
>> separate package. Do you have anything special in mind here?
>
> I think I was wrong. I would love to get the class in a subpackage because I find javax.validation quite crowded but
> ParameterNameProvider is no different than MessageInterpolator or TraversableResolver.

Ok, then I'd say let's leave it in javax.validation. A new package
only for ParameterNameProvider doesn't make much sense, and adding it
to j.v.spi doesn't feel right to me, as then also some other types
should consequently go there, which we can't do right now.

--Gunnar

> _______________________________________________
> beanvalidation-dev mailing list
> beanvalidation-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev