[bv-dev] [BVAL-226] Consider runtime type when building property path

[Sebastian Thomschke]

  I am +1 for runtime type consideration.

Seb

On 30.05.2012 20:50, Emmanuel Bernard wrote:
> For your info, the change is quite minimal
> https://github.com/emmanuelbernard/beanvalidation-spec/commit/f85703a2a395b0cb95148c9eabc6b4a439df717c
>
> On 30 mai 2012, at 20:11, Emmanuel Bernard wrote:
>
>> It seems there is some kind of consensus that considering the runtime type instead of the satin type to build the property path is better.
>> Check out https://hibernate.onjira.com/browse/BVAL-226 and let me know if you object.
>>
>> Otherwise, I plan to clarify this in the spec.
>>
>> Emmanuel
>> _______________________________________________
>> beanvalidation-dev mailing list
>> beanvalidation-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> beanvalidation-dev mailing list
> beanvalidation-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev