[bv-dev] Validator#forMethods()

[Emmanuel Bernard]

I like forMethods because it resonates faster on people's mind. But I
can live and get forExecutables grow on me. So I'm neutral.

Emmanuel

On Fri 2013-01-04 11:05, Gunnar Morling wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> While working on the TCK, I came across our new method
> Validator#forMethods() which allows to validate method and constructor
> parameters/return values.
> 
> Given that we introduced the term "executable" when referring to both
> methods and constructors, I wondered whether the method should better be
> named "forExecutables()".
> 
> Thoughts?
> 
> --Gunnar

> _______________________________________________
> beanvalidation-dev mailing list
> beanvalidation-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev