[bv-dev] BV 2.0 - Add constraints?

[Marco Molteni]

Hi Gunnar,

1. Constraint composition: I agree with Guillaume, I thinks is better let
the providers do their own implementation.
2. Email regex: Good for me.
3. @Positive/@Negative: Ok.

Thanks!

Marco



On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 3:54 PM, Guillaume Smet <guillaume.smet at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi Gunnar,
>
> On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 2:43 PM, Gunnar Morling <gunnar at hibernate.org>
> wrote:
>
>> * Should @NotEmpty mandate the usage of constraint composition (as
>> it's done in the PRs)? It essentially prescribes an "implementation",
>> i.e. providers wouldn't even need a constraint validator for it. But
>> then this excludes any more efficient implementation a provider may
>> have (well, they could by special-handling this constraint).
>>
>
> I'm not convinced it's such a good idea to use constraint composition for
> @NotBlank and @NotEmpty. I would let the implementation to the providers,
> especially since using constraint composition does not really buy us
> anything in this case.
>
> --
> Guillaume
>
> _______________________________________________
> beanvalidation-dev mailing list
> beanvalidation-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/beanvalidation-dev/attachments/20170324/3832245d/attachment.html