[cdi-dev] Moving to JSR-348

[Pete Muir]

Yes, but the PMO told me I needed a unanimous vote I think ;-)

Sorry for the extra work!

On 7 Dec 2011, at 15:16, Mark Struberg wrote:

> +1
> 
> (we already voted on this, didn't we?)
> 
> LieGrue,
> strub
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: Pete Muir <pmuir at redhat.com>
>> To: Joseph Bergmark <bergmark at us.ibm.com>; norman.erck at holisticon.de; mathieu.ancelin at gmail.com; George Gastaldi <gegastaldi at gmail.com>; Richard Hightower <richardhightower at gmail.com>; Werner Keil <werner.keil at gmx.net>; Jérôme Petit <jerome.petit at serli.com>; Antoine Sabot-Durand <antoine at sabot-durand.net>; Mark Struberg <struberg at yahoo.de>; Sivakumar Thyagarajan <sivakumar.thyagarajan at oracle.com>
>> Cc: cdi-dev <cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>> Sent: Wednesday, December 7, 2011 11:18 AM
>> Subject: Moving to JSR-348
>> 
>> Joseph, Norman, Mathieu, George, Richard, Werner, Jerome, Antoine, Mark, Siva,
>> 
>> We would like to move JSR-346 to the new process defined by JSR-348.
>> 
>> The JCP PMO have raised two points:
>> 
>> 1) A unanimous yes vote from the EG members listed on the JCP page 
>> http://www.jcp.org/en/jsr/summary?id=346 makes it clearer we can move.
>> 2) The JSR submission makes note of a private alias for EG members. We've 
>> not used that at any point, so we would also like a clear vote from you to 
>> remove that private alias.
>> 
>> Finally, I've clarified the feedback process at 
>> https://github.com/jboss/cdi/wiki#wiki-feedback - you might want to subscribe to 
>> cdi-feedback. I will forward anything relevant to cdi-dev anyway.
>> 
>> Pete
>>