[cdi-dev] [JBoss JIRA] (CDI-70) Clarify that if an extension provides an Annotated* then it is considered "metadata complete"
Pete Muir (Commented) (JIRA)
jira-events at lists.jboss.org
Tue Dec 13 14:48:09 EST 2011
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-70?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12650627#comment-12650627 ]
Pete Muir commented on CDI-70:
------------------------------
I think the javadoc is just wrong.
> Clarify that if an extension provides an Annotated* then it is considered "metadata complete"
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CDI-70
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-70
> Project: CDI Specification Issues
> Issue Type: Clarification
> Components: Portable Extensions
> Affects Versions: 1.0
> Reporter: Pete Muir
> Assignee: Pete Muir
> Fix For: 1.1.EDR1
>
>
> I think the correct behavior is to ignore any members that are missing from the AnnotatedType. You should not be directly accessing the reflection API at all. If the parameters for a method or a constructor don't match the underlying class, it should be considered a definition error.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.jboss.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
More information about the cdi-dev
mailing list