[cdi-dev] [weld-dev] clarification regarding extensions in non-bean archives

Dan Allen dan.j.allen at gmail.com
Tue Jan 18 15:07:22 EST 2011


On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 05:55, Shane Bryzak <sbryzak at redhat.com> wrote:

>
> Should we also raise a CDITCK issue to add a test for this?


That was my intention. Writing the tests in Arquillian just made it easier
for me to communicate the problem in a timely fashion.

I've filed two issues to cover these two scenarios, respectively:

https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDITCK-205
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDITCK-206

-Dan

-- 
Dan Allen
Principal Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action
Registered Linux User #231597

http://mojavelinux.com
http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction
http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/cdi-dev/attachments/20110118/0cd3419a/attachment.html 


More information about the cdi-dev mailing list