[cdi-dev] [JBoss JIRA] Commented: (CDI-142) Clarify behaviour of specializing beans across bean archive boundaries
Mark Struberg (JIRA)
jira-events at lists.jboss.org
Wed Jul 6 04:26:23 EDT 2011
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-142?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12612586#comment-12612586 ]
Mark Struberg commented on CDI-142:
-----------------------------------
We had this discussion in another issue where we discussed about @ApplicationScoped vs @EarScoped (which does not yet exist) in CDI-129. We could make our live easy if we say that @ApplicationScoped (which is the vast majority of beans) is _per_ _webapp_ (+ one for the 'shared' stuff like JMS), because every WebApp has it's own BeanManager anyway.
Then we can go on and say that 'an @EarScoped bean must only be specialized, alternated, etc in a library which is accessible to all @ApplicationScoped beans'. Which means a shared ejb-jar lib in a EAR.
> Clarify behaviour of specializing beans across bean archive boundaries
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CDI-142
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-142
> Project: CDI Specification Issues
> Issue Type: Clarification
> Reporter: Stuart Douglas
>
> For instance, if a bean in a war specializes a bean in an ejb jar does the bean in the war become visible to other bean archives that would not normally be able to see it?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
More information about the cdi-dev
mailing list