[cdi-dev] [JBoss JIRA] Commented: (CDI-136) Assumption all @Stateful beans should be passivation capable

[David Blevins (JIRA)]

    [ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-136?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12610484#comment-12610484 ] 

David Blevins commented on CDI-136:
-----------------------------------

I see that these three tests are already in the excludes list due to the remove method issues.  Note we'll still want to fix them so they explicitly declare @SessionScoped.


org.jboss.jsr299.tck.tests.context.passivating.broken.enterpriseBeanWithNonPassivatingDecorator.EnterpriseBeanWithNonPassivatingDecoratorTest
org.jboss.jsr299.tck.tests.context.passivating.broken.dependentScopedProducerMethodReturnsNonSerializableObjectForInjectionIntoStatefulSessionBean.EnterpriseBeanWithIllegalDependencyTest
org.jboss.jsr299.tck.tests.context.passivating.broken.dependentScopedProducerFieldReturnsNonSerializableObjectForInjectionIntoStatefulSessionBean.EnterpriseBeanWithIllegalDependencyTest


> Assumption all @Stateful beans should be passivation capable
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CDI-136
>                 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-136
>             Project: CDI Specification Issues
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Beans, Java EE integration
>    Affects Versions: 1.0
>            Reporter: David Blevins
>            Assignee: Pete Muir
>             Fix For: 1.1 (Confirmed)
>
>
> Stateful session beans in transactions can't be passivated and shouldn't have passivation requirements either, like request scope.
> Stateful beans can be any scope.  They are the Bertie Bott's Every Flavor Beans of EJB.  It's too big of a brush to say that passivation is always required.  That's the part we need to fix.
> Stateful session beans that do passivate are pretty rare.  They should be assumed to be @NormalScope unless otherwise specified.
> The user should be able to say if they want passivation validation on their stateful bean and dependencies.
> We should at a minimum change the related language of the spec to be "For every bean which declares a passivating scope, and for every stateful session bean ***that requires passivation***, " and discuss how to determine that an SFSB requires passivation.
> From the EJB perspective this has always been a container detail, but we could have a rule in CDI that states the checks are not enforced unless the bean class explicitly implements java.io.Serializable.  Alternatively we could make a generic @PassivationScoped annotation for other architectures that have flexible scopes and support passivation concepts.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira