[cdi-dev] ProcessAnnotatedType question related to Seam-Config
Pete Muir
pmuir at redhat.com
Fri Oct 14 12:35:09 EDT 2011
Mark means CDI-58, not CDI-18 for anyone else confused ;-)
On 14 Oct 2011, at 15:10, Mark Struberg wrote:
> Txs Jozef!
>
> I've commented the issue in CDI-18.
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: Jozef Hartinger <jharting at redhat.com>
>> To: Mark Struberg <struberg at yahoo.de>
>> Cc: cdi-dev <cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>> Sent: Friday, October 14, 2011 1:57 PM
>> Subject: Re: [cdi-dev] ProcessAnnotatedType question related to Seam-Config
>>
>> T he fact that you can have multiple AnnotatedTypes per Java type is
>> clarified in CDI-58.
>>
>>
>> On 10/14/2011 12:52 PM, Mark Struberg wrote:
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>> Currently tracking down why seam-config sometimes does not work work OWB.
>>>
>>> Seems that the issue is that OWB and Weld does tread AnnotatedTypes
>> registered with BeforeBeanDiscovery in a different way.
>>>
>>> Assume we have the following class in a BDA:
>>>
>>> @RequestScoped
>>>
>>> public class Doodings {
>>> ...
>>> }
>>>
>>> and you have a seam-beans.xml config for it too
>>>
>>> Then seam-xml will add an AnnotatedType for it in @Observes
>> BeforeBeanDiscovery. So far so good.
>>>
>>> Later in the class scanning, when scanning Coodings.class, we (Apache
>> OpenWebBeans) recognizes that the class already has a prepared AnnotatedType and
>> use that for the system event. Apparently Weld does things different and creates
>> a fresh AnnotatedType purely based on the native class!
>>> That's the reason why seam-config in weld has to veto the freshly
>> scanned type to prevent double existence of Bean<Doodings>, and in OWB
>> this hack causes a problem...
>>>
>>> I think there is room for improvement in the specification of
>> AnnotatedTypes in the CDI spec ...
>>>
>>> The behaviour must get clarified imo, wdyt?
>>>
>>> LieGrue,
>>> strub
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> cdi-dev mailing list
>>> cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cdi-dev mailing list
> cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
More information about the cdi-dev
mailing list