[cdi-dev] ProcessAnnotatedType question related to Seam-Config

Pete Muir pmuir at redhat.com
Fri Oct 14 12:35:09 EDT 2011


Mark means CDI-58, not CDI-18 for anyone else confused ;-)

On 14 Oct 2011, at 15:10, Mark Struberg wrote:

> Txs Jozef!
> 
> I've commented the issue in CDI-18.
> 
> LieGrue,
> strub
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: Jozef Hartinger <jharting at redhat.com>
>> To: Mark Struberg <struberg at yahoo.de>
>> Cc: cdi-dev <cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>> Sent: Friday, October 14, 2011 1:57 PM
>> Subject: Re: [cdi-dev] ProcessAnnotatedType question related to Seam-Config
>> 
>> T he fact that you can have multiple AnnotatedTypes per Java type is 
>> clarified in CDI-58.
>> 
>> 
>> On 10/14/2011 12:52 PM, Mark Struberg wrote:
>>> Hi!
>>> 
>>> Currently tracking down why seam-config sometimes does not work work OWB.
>>> 
>>> Seems that the issue is that OWB and Weld does tread AnnotatedTypes 
>> registered with BeforeBeanDiscovery in a different way.
>>> 
>>> Assume we have the following class in a BDA:
>>> 
>>> @RequestScoped
>>> 
>>> public class Doodings {
>>> ...
>>> }
>>> 
>>> and you have a seam-beans.xml config  for it too
>>> 
>>> Then seam-xml will add an AnnotatedType for it in @Observes 
>> BeforeBeanDiscovery. So far so good.
>>> 
>>> Later in the class scanning, when scanning Coodings.class, we (Apache 
>> OpenWebBeans) recognizes that the class already has a prepared AnnotatedType and 
>> use that for the system event. Apparently Weld does things different and creates 
>> a fresh AnnotatedType purely based on the native class!
>>> That's the reason why seam-config in weld has to veto the freshly 
>> scanned type to prevent double existence of Bean<Doodings>, and in OWB 
>> this hack causes a problem...
>>> 
>>> I think there is room for improvement in the specification of 
>> AnnotatedTypes in the CDI spec ...
>>> 
>>> The behaviour must get clarified imo, wdyt?
>>> 
>>> LieGrue,
>>> strub
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> cdi-dev mailing list
>>> cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cdi-dev mailing list
> cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev




More information about the cdi-dev mailing list