[cdi-dev] Question for clarification and my understanding

[Mark Struberg]

They must have at least 1 non-private ct (this includes the default ct). And if it does have a parameter, then it must be annotated with @Inject.
This is perfectly enough to create a proxy. Of course this @Inject constructor must not get called while creating the proxy itself (because this might contain certain checks and logic). In this very case a default-ct must get added to the proxy-subclass via byte code enhancement techniques.


Also please note that not the CDI specification defines any interceptor behaviour but the Interceptors-1.1 specification (or any update which gets defined by the EJB-3.2 Expert Group). So any assumption we made in CDI must be synced with their work.


And actually, all beans of passivating scopes must provide a default-ct because of Serialization reasons anyway, isn't?


LieGrue,
strub



----- Original Message -----
> From: Stuart Douglas <stuart.w.douglas at gmail.com>
> To: Mark Struberg <struberg at yahoo.de>
> Cc: Jozef Hartinger <jharting at redhat.com>; cdi-dev <cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org>
> Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2011 6:54 AM
> Subject: Re: [cdi-dev] Question for clarification and my understanding
> 
> I thought that interceptors had to be done via subclassing as well, as the spec 
> does not specify that intercepted beans have to have a default constructor?
> 
> Stuart
> 
> 
> On 20/10/2011, at 3:44 PM, Mark Struberg wrote:
> 
>>  The spec says that only Decorators need to be done via subclassing.
>> 
>>  LieGrue,
>>  strub
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>  ----- Original Message -----
>>>  From: Jozef Hartinger <jharting at redhat.com>
>>>  To: Rick Hightower <richardhightower at gmail.com>
>>>  Cc: cdi-dev <cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>>>  Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2011 7:33 PM
>>>  Subject: Re: [cdi-dev] Question for clarification and my understanding
>>> 
>>>  Only normal scoped beans require client proxies. Decoration and 
>>>  interception should be implemented by subclassing (see CDI-74, CDI-44).
>>> 
>>>  On 10/19/2011 07:24 PM, Rick Hightower wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>  Section 5.4
>>>> 
>>>>  "Client proxies are never required for a bean whose scope is a 
> 
>>>>  pseudo-scope such as @Dependent."
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>  I understand the concept of client proxies to allow for scopes and 
>>>>  context.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>  Is this a true statement...
>>>> 
>>>>  Client proxies may not be needed for @Dependent (pseudo scope). CDI 
> 
>>>>  may provide a client proxy for @Dependent.
>>>>  A proxy is needed for @Dependent objects that are decorated or 
>>>>  intercepted with Decorators or Interceptors.
>>>> 
>>>>  Are all injected objects proxied or only objects that are normal 
>>>>  scoped or decorated?
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>  -- 
>>>>  *Rick Hightower*
>>>>  (415) 968-9037
>>>>  Profile <http://www.google.com/profiles/RichardHightower>
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>  _______________________________________________
>>>>  cdi-dev mailing list
>>>>  cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>>  https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
>>>  _______________________________________________
>>>  cdi-dev mailing list
>>>  cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>  https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
>>> 
>>  _______________________________________________
>>  cdi-dev mailing list
>>  cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>  https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
>