[cdi-dev] [JBoss JIRA] Resolved: (CDI-140) improve passivation capable bean validation for @Dependent scoped beans in 6.6.4
Pete Muir (JIRA)
jira-events at lists.jboss.org
Thu Sep 29 12:44:26 EDT 2011
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-140?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Pete Muir resolved CDI-140.
---------------------------
Assignee: Pete Muir
Resolution: Done
> improve passivation capable bean validation for @Dependent scoped beans in 6.6.4
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CDI-140
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-140
> Project: CDI Specification Issues
> Issue Type: Clarification
> Components: Resolution
> Affects Versions: 1.0
> Reporter: Mark Struberg
> Assignee: Pete Muir
> Fix For: 1.1 (Confirmed)
>
>
> Currently section 6.6.4 defines that @Dependent scoped beans which get injected into a bean of a passivating scope must be Serializable.
> "If a producer method or field of scope @Dependent returns an unserializable object for injection into an injection point that requires a passivation capable dependency, the container must throw an Illegal- ProductException"
> The question is how to interpret "that requires a passivation capable dependency".
> It would e.g. be perfectly fine if the @Dependent bean is _not_ Serializable *if* the injectionpoint will be serialized via a writeObject or Externalizable#writeExternal.
> Proposal: to explicitly add a check for Modifier.TRANSIENT and writeObject(ObjectOutputStream) and Externalizable#writeExternal(ObjectOutput)
> This is very important for @Dependent scoped producers of legacy classes because there is otherwise no way to inject such classes at all.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
More information about the cdi-dev
mailing list