[cdi-dev] AnnotatedType discussion
struberg at yahoo.de
Mon Aug 13 15:18:59 EDT 2012
Hi Pete, others!
I found the issue I was searching for:
One of the discussions in the EG meeting was about whether we like to have 1 AnnotatedType per physical class or if we allow for multiple of them.
Both ways have pros and cons.
If we just have one AT per Class, I think we don't need the freshly introduced ProcessSyntheticAnnotatedType neither. Especially the trick with the getSource() sounds pretty error prone to me.
More information about the cdi-dev