[cdi-dev] AnnotatedType discussion

Mark Struberg struberg at yahoo.de
Mon Aug 13 15:18:59 EDT 2012

Hi Pete, others!

I found the issue I was searching for:

One of the discussions in the EG meeting was about whether we like to have 1 AnnotatedType per physical class or if we allow for multiple of them.
Both ways have pros and cons. 

If we just have one AT per Class, I think we don't need the freshly introduced ProcessSyntheticAnnotatedType neither. Especially the trick with the getSource() sounds pretty error prone to me.


More information about the cdi-dev mailing list