[cdi-dev] Minutes from EG meeting 20/08/2012

[Stuart Douglas]

Yes, that time is fine for me. 

Stuart

On 28/08/2012, at 12:10 AM, Pete Muir <pmuir at redhat.com> wrote:

> Stuart, can you confirm this time for this week?
> 
> On 21 Aug 2012, at 23:04, Pete Muir wrote:
> 
>> That works for me - how about Thursday/Friday - http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=CDI+EG+meeting+%28special+Stuart+friendly+edition%29&iso=20120824T00&p1=240
>> 
>> On 21 Aug 2012, at 23:00, Stuart Douglas wrote:
>> 
>>> 
>>> Is midnight Sydney time ok? I can't do Friday, but other than that I should be able to do pretty much any week night.
>>> 
>>> I have actually been thinking about this. What if we say that any additional added AnnotatedTypes are not passivation capable, but then add an additional version of addAnnotatedType() where the extension explicitly specifies the bean id to make it passivation capable? 
>>> 
>>> Stuart
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 21/08/2012, at 11:51 PM, Pete Muir <pmuir at redhat.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Stuart, we would like to run over the multiple annotated types issue in a meeting to get resolution.
>>>> 
>>>> Can you look at https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/pub?key=0ApqHbXzB1R1gdGRFWXB4TVpNeWFJd1JZd1ZrbnZrY0E&output=html and pick a time you can do that gets as many of those people available as possible?
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks!
>>>> 
>>>> On 21 Aug 2012, at 14:45, Pete Muir wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> * Multiple Annotated Types - we need to schedule a meeting which Stuart can make, to discuss. Pete to arrange.
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> cdi-dev mailing list
>> cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cdi-dev mailing list
> cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev