[cdi-dev] [JBoss JIRA] (CDI-227) API is underspecified for corner cases
Guy Veraghtert (JIRA)
jira-events at lists.jboss.org
Thu May 3 04:23:17 EDT 2012
Guy Veraghtert created CDI-227:
Summary: API is underspecified for corner cases
Project: CDI Specification Issues
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Java SE Integration, Packaging and Deployment
Affects Versions: 1.1.EDR1, 1.0
Reporter: Guy Veraghtert
The CDI api's are mainly used to develop (portable) extensions. In practice, we see that those so called _portable_ extensions are not portable at all due to underspecified api's.
For example BeanManager.resolve(set) doesn't specify how to deal with an empty set or null. This leads to incompatible implementations and unportable extensions. See for example https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-625 (Unfortunately Websphere 8 includes openwebbeans < 1.1.3, making Seam3 not out-of-the-box usable). Currently most implementations (weld, owb and candi) return null for an empty set. OWB returns null when null is passed, others will throw an exception.
To create extensions that are truly portable, we should specify all corner cases (what about BeanManager.getBean((String)null)?). In theory developers should not depend on undefined behavior, but in practice we all do (Seam3 is full of examples).
Ideally, we should go over the complete public API and specify what should happen with these corner cases: null-values, empty collections, ...
Just adding that an IllegalArgumentException should be thrown in case of null for example would suffice.
These things are very easy to incorporate in the TCK and would contribute a lot to the success of portable extensions
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.jboss.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
More information about the cdi-dev