[cdi-dev] [JBoss JIRA] (CDI-129) Clarify behaviour of @ApplicationScoped in EARs
Jozef Hartinger (JIRA)
jira-events at lists.jboss.org
Thu Oct 18 03:09:03 EDT 2012
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-129?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12727524#comment-12727524 ]
Jozef Hartinger edited comment on CDI-129 at 10/18/12 3:08 AM:
---------------------------------------------------------------
{quote} By not providing a scope bigger than 1 per WAR, we DO NOT HAVE THOSE AFOREMENTIONED PROBLEMS IN CDI. {quote}
OK, assume there is a shared @RequestScoped bean R in the shared library injected both into a Servlet in your web app and into the MailService in the shared lib. No alternatives nor specialization this time. What you say is that the Servlet would operate on a different instance of the same R bean than the MailService? In the same call stack during processing of the single same request? How is that consistent? Maybe we could do a poll if this is what people want ;-)
{quote} on which part? On the 'unusable' or the 'multiple contextual instances per Injection Point for the same call stack'? {quote}
I disagree that it is unusable.
was (Author: jharting):
{quote} By not providing a scope bigger than 1 per WAR, we DO NOT HAVE THOSE AFOREMENTIONED PROBLEMS IN CDI. {quote}
OK, assume there is a shared @RequestScoped bean R in the shared library injected both into a Servlet in your web app and into the MailService. No alternatives nor specialization this time. What you say is that the Servlet would operate on a different instance of the same R bean than the MailService? In the same call stack during processing of the single same request? How is that consistent? Maybe we could do a poll if this is what people want ;-)
{quote} on which part? On the 'unusable' or the 'multiple contextual instances per Injection Point for the same call stack'? {quote}
I disagree that it is unusable.
> Clarify behaviour of @ApplicationScoped in EARs
> -----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CDI-129
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-129
> Project: CDI Specification Issues
> Issue Type: Clarification
> Components: Contexts
> Affects Versions: 1.0
> Reporter: Mark Struberg
> Assignee: Pete Muir
> Fix For: 1.1 (Proposed)
>
>
> Since @ApplicationScoped currently is defined in 6.5.2 as to be 'like in the Servlet specification' this means that you will get a new instance for every WebApplication (WAR file).
> There is currently no specified CDI scope for providing a single shared instance for a whole EAR.
> We could (ab-)use @Singleton for that, but this is currently not well defined at all.
> Alternatively we could introduce an own new annotation like @EnterpriseScoped or likes.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
More information about the cdi-dev
mailing list