[cdi-dev] [JBoss JIRA] (CDI-129) Clarify behaviour of @ApplicationScoped in EARs
Jozef Hartinger (JIRA)
jira-events at lists.jboss.org
Mon Oct 22 07:41:02 EDT 2012
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-129?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12728336#comment-12728336 ]
Jozef Hartinger commented on CDI-129:
-------------------------------------
I am not sure which part of my comment does your argumentation relates to.
I assume you accept that there are the two possible approaches. I assume you accept that the first approach does not conflict with CDI 1.0 (Talking about the wiring only. Nothing about the @ApplicationScoped yet). Can we both agree up to this point?
What I guess you are arguing about is whether the semi-static approach is valid or not.
> Clarify behaviour of @ApplicationScoped in EARs
> -----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CDI-129
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-129
> Project: CDI Specification Issues
> Issue Type: Clarification
> Components: Contexts
> Affects Versions: 1.0
> Reporter: Mark Struberg
> Assignee: Pete Muir
> Fix For: 1.1 (Proposed)
>
>
> Since @ApplicationScoped currently is defined in 6.5.2 as to be 'like in the Servlet specification' this means that you will get a new instance for every WebApplication (WAR file).
> There is currently no specified CDI scope for providing a single shared instance for a whole EAR.
> We could (ab-)use @Singleton for that, but this is currently not well defined at all.
> Alternatively we could introduce an own new annotation like @EnterpriseScoped or likes.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
More information about the cdi-dev
mailing list