[cdi-dev] [JBoss JIRA] (CDI-129) Clarify behaviour of @ApplicationScoped in EARs

Jozef Hartinger (JIRA) jira-events at lists.jboss.org
Mon Oct 22 07:41:02 EDT 2012


    [ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-129?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12728336#comment-12728336 ] 

Jozef Hartinger commented on CDI-129:
-------------------------------------

I am not sure which part of my comment does your argumentation relates to.

I assume you accept that there are the two possible approaches. I assume you accept that the first approach does not conflict with CDI 1.0 (Talking about the wiring only. Nothing about the @ApplicationScoped yet). Can we both agree up to this point?

What I guess you are arguing about is whether the semi-static approach is valid or not.


                
> Clarify behaviour of @ApplicationScoped in EARs
> -----------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CDI-129
>                 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-129
>             Project: CDI Specification Issues
>          Issue Type: Clarification
>          Components: Contexts
>    Affects Versions: 1.0
>            Reporter: Mark Struberg
>            Assignee: Pete Muir
>             Fix For: 1.1 (Proposed)
>
>
> Since @ApplicationScoped currently is defined in 6.5.2 as to be 'like in the Servlet specification' this means that you will get a new instance for every WebApplication (WAR file).
> There is currently no specified CDI scope for providing a single shared instance for a whole EAR.
> We could (ab-)use @Singleton for that, but this is currently not well defined at all.
> Alternatively we could introduce an own new annotation like @EnterpriseScoped or likes. 

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


More information about the cdi-dev mailing list