[cdi-dev] @ExcludeClassInterceptors for @InterceptorBinding style ?

[Mark Struberg]

I did some further research. There is even a CDI TCK for the @Interceptors case
Look at org.jboss.jsr299.tck.interceptors.tests.method.Dog


But there is not yet a positive nor negative test for @InterceptorBinding style interceptors.

In OWB we support this, but I guess it's non-portable.
But could indeed be handy to also have it defined in the spec!


LieGrue,
strub



----- Original Message -----
> From: Martin Kouba <mkouba at redhat.com>
> To: cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org
> Cc: 
> Sent: Friday, January 4, 2013 12:11 PM
> Subject: Re: [cdi-dev] @ExcludeClassInterceptors for @InterceptorBinding style ?
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I think the answer is NO because the CDI spec does not mention this
> annotation in "9.5 Interceptor resolution" where the process of 
> matching
> interceptors to a business method of a certain bean is defined.
> 
> On the other hand it could be a useful feature. WDYT?
> 
> BTW Weld does not support this at the moment.
> 
> Martin
> 
> Dne 3.1.2013 23:37, Mark Struberg napsal(a):
>>  Hi colleagues!
>> 
>>  @ExcludeClassInterceptors do account for @Interceptors style interceptors.
>>  But should they also disable @InterceptorBinding style interceptors applied 
> on a class?
>> 
>>  LieGrue,
>>  strub
>>  _______________________________________________
>>  cdi-dev mailing list
>>  cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>  https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
>> 
> _______________________________________________
> cdi-dev mailing list
> cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
>