[cdi-dev] [JBoss JIRA] (CDI-286) Inconsistencies in chapter "Validation of passivation capable beans and dependencies"
Pete Muir (JIRA)
jira-events at lists.jboss.org
Thu Jan 17 13:13:21 EST 2013
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-286?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Pete Muir resolved CDI-286.
---------------------------
Assignee: Pete Muir
Resolution: Done
Merged
> Inconsistencies in chapter "Validation of passivation capable beans and dependencies"
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CDI-286
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-286
> Project: CDI Specification Issues
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 1.1.PRD
> Reporter: Martin Kouba
> Assignee: Pete Muir
> Fix For: 1.1.PFD
>
>
> The spec states in 6.6.4. "Validation of passivation capable beans and dependencies":
> {quote}
> If a bean which declares a passivating scope type, or any stateful session bean, has a decorator or interceptor which is not a
> passivation capable dependency, the container automatically detects the problem and treats it as a deployment problem.
> {quote}
> WRT CDI-136 "If a bean which declares a passivating scope type, or any stateful session bean," should be replaced with: "If a managed bean or stateful session bean which declares a passivating scope".
> I'm not sure about the wording _"has a decorator or interceptor which is not a passivation capable dependency"_ because the wording in section 6.6.1. "Passivation capable beans" is _"interceptors and decorators of the bean are passivation capable"_ (passivation capable dependency vs passivation capable).
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
More information about the cdi-dev
mailing list