[cdi-dev] [JBoss JIRA] (CDI-352) Clarify whether an interceptor/decorator enabled for a bean archive must be packaged in a bean archive
Pete Muir (JIRA)
jira-events at lists.jboss.org
Thu Mar 28 13:28:46 EDT 2013
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-352?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Pete Muir resolved CDI-352.
---------------------------
Resolution: Done
I've tried to make it clearer that this is wrong. Is there a CDI TCK issue for this?
> Clarify whether an interceptor/decorator enabled for a bean archive must be packaged in a bean archive
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CDI-352
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-352
> Project: CDI Specification Issues
> Issue Type: Clarification
> Components: Decorators, Interceptors
> Affects Versions: 1.1.PFD
> Reporter: Jozef Hartinger
> Assignee: Pete Muir
> Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: 1.1.FD
>
>
> There is a TCK test in which an archive with the beans.xml file enables an interceptor (by listing the interceptor class name in beans.xml). The interceptor class is packaged in another library archive which is not a bean archive. It is not clear from the specification if an interceptor bound using interceptor bindings may only be packaged in a bean archive or whether a CDI implementation should pull the interceptor definition based on the declaration in the beans.xml file even if the interceptor is outside of a bean archive.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
More information about the cdi-dev
mailing list