[cdi-dev] CDi 1.1.1 MR

Pete Muir pmuir at redhat.com
Mon Nov 18 10:03:52 EST 2013


I added the cdi-1.1-mr to label to each of these issues, and created this query.

https://issues.jboss.org/issues/?filter=12320502

On 13 Nov 2013, at 16:54, Antoine Sabot-Durand <antoine.sabotdurand at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> Walking thru most of « clarification » ticket I built my whish list for MR. I know it’s quite long and I don’t ticket could resolved for 1.1.1 (not impossible but quite hard), but I think we need at least to give a status on these open tickets :
> 
> CDI-77	Clarify what happens when the user creates a unbound recursive injection with Dependent scoped beans
> CDI-220	behaviour of CDI bean @Specializes session bean is undefined
> CDI-280	clarify usage of 'bean' term usage in the spec
> CDI-401	Clarify the meaning of "bean class local view"
> CDI-395	Public fields in extensions should not be allowed
> CDI-392	Clarify when the operations of BeanManager can be called
> CDI-382	Clarify interceptors are not associated with the result of a producer method/field
> CDI-320	Clarify whether ProcessAnnotatedType should be fired for annotations*
> CDI-318	@WithAnnotations types can appear on any supertype
> CDI-405	Reword the description of @RequestScoped and @ApplicationScoped in section 2.4.1
> CDI-397	Clarify Section 6.6.3 regarding singletons
> CDI-372	clarify behaviour of implicit bean archive
> CDI-381	Additional implementations of Request Context
> CDI-380	Clarify SessionScoped
> CDI-379	Clarify life cycle of RequestScoped
> 
> And my bonus one (yes I hesitated on this but IMO we really should statute on it)
> 
> CDI-370 Expand @RequestScoped and @SessionScoped to account for WebSocket
> 
> 
> 
> Antoine Sabot-Durand /@antoine_sd
> ———————————————
> CDI co-spec lead
> CDI eco-system development
> Agorava tech lead
> 
> Le 8 nov. 2013 à 18:34, Pete Muir <pmuir at redhat.com> a écrit :
> 
>> +1
>> 
>> A MR can run for 1,2, or 3 months. We should choose one, I suggest 2 months, and we submit for the MR on 1st Dec (meaning it closes 1st Feb).
>> 
>> On 8 Nov 2013, at 16:51, Antoine Sabot-Durand <antoine.sabotdurand at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> I created a new version in JIRA : 1.1.1 (Proposed) : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI/fixforversion/12323655
>>> 
>>> I propose we close this list the week after Devoxx (one week from now). We could have a meeting (Hangout) on the 18th, then let us a few more days and close the list on the 21st.
>>> It gives us one week to complete this list.
>>> 
>>> What do you think ? 
>>> 
>>> Antoine
>>> 
>>> Le 8 nov. 2013 à 09:39, Antoine Sabot-Durand <antoine.sabotdurand at gmail.com> a écrit :
>>> 
>>>> For the record I report Jozef priority list here (better thread name)
>>>> Great to see CDI-377 on the top of your list ;
>>>> 
>>>>> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-377
>>>>> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-389
>>>>> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-404
>>>>> and possibly
>>>>> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-406
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Antoine
>>>> 
>>>> Antoine Sabot-Durand
>>>> 
>>>> Le 7 nov. 2013 à 16:40, Antoine Sabot-Durand <antoine.sabotdurand at gmail.com> a écrit :
>>>> 
>>>>> Hi all
>>>>> 
>>>>> Maintenance Release is indeed quite critical. As stated by Pete we should have a tight scope but address significant issue or needed clarification. Some interoperability issues should also IMO be studied to see if we can address them in 1.1.1 (the https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-377 comes to my mind).
>>>>> As we are a bit late on this MR, I propose to try to have it time boxed (deliver early, deliver often) to show we’re still alive ;) .
>>>>> My main idea is to prioritize issues, give us a deadline (not too straight) and do the maximum in this time frame.
>>>>> 
>>>>> WDYT
>>>>> 
>>>>> Antoine
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> cdi-dev mailing list
>>> cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
>> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cdi-dev mailing list
> cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev




More information about the cdi-dev mailing list