[cdi-dev] meeting 11/18/2013 notes

Pete Muir pmuir at redhat.com
Fri Nov 22 09:14:09 EST 2013


On 22 Nov 2013, at 07:12, Antoine Sabot-Durand <antoine at sabot-durand.net> wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> 
> Sorry for the delay.
> You’ll find the 11/18/2013 meeting notes here [1]. The asciidoc source below :
> 
> = CDI EG meeting 11/18/2013 notes on CDI 1.1.1 MR
> 
> The goal of this 1st meeting was to organize the MR launching, and start discussing its content
> The following people assisted this meeting :
> 
> * Pete Muir (pm)
> * Mark Struberg (ms)
> * Jozef Hartinger (jh)
> * Joseph Bergmark (jb)
> * Arne Limburg (al)
> * Antoine Sabot-Durand (asd)
> 
> == Proposed Agenda 
> 
> The following agenda was proposed by *asd*
> 
> 1. MR proposed roadmap 
> 2. Content of the proposed list 
> 3. Try to have a 1st decision on big tickets (tickets with great impact on implementation or spec) 
>  * CDI-377 : automatic JSR-330 annotation processing problematic 
>  * CDI-370 : Expand @RequestScoped and @SessionScoped to account for WebSocket 
>  * others 
> 
> == Proposed Roadmap
> As we should run the MR in 60 days and that we cannot change its content after its start we proposed the following roadmap
> 
> * 16th Dec - list of issues complete
> * 6th Jan - Maintenance review starts
> * 7th March - Maintenance review ends
> * 21st March - Maintenance ballot ends
> 
> This roadmap integrates the holidays constraints as well. It'll be confirmed after the meeting *pm* and *asd* will have with the JCP on 11/26 

Assume you mean Java EE spec leads/Oracle here, not JCP (likewise for other references below).

> 
> == Content of the proposed list
> 
> *asd* stressed on the fact that the long proposed list won't probably fit in the MR but that would be nice to provide them a status.
> We decided to deal the most important ticket first. 
> 
> == list of tickets
> 
> === https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-377[CDI-377 : automatic JSR-330 annotation processing problematic]
> All the participant agreed that this ticket could be quite tricky. 2 scenario for solving it
> 
> * Having an umbrella scanning mechanism : beyond CDI and off course the MR.*pm* took note of escalate this need to the JCP
> * in the meantime could investigate an exclusion in beans.xml. this solution is to be explored and if we have an agreement we could provide a fix in MR scope
>   
> === https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-370[CDI-370 : Expand @RequestScoped and @SessionScoped to account for WebSocket]
> A tricky issue as well. No one in the EG has a sufficient knowloedge of websocket sepc to statute ont in so *pm* propose to ask help to *Matthias Wessendorf* 
> 
> Other tickets related to `@RequestScoped` clarification 
> 
> * https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-379[CDI-379 Clarify life cycle of RequestScoped]
> * https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-381[CDI-381 and other request scope related ticket]
> * https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-406[CDI-406 Make stereotypes bean defining annotations]
> 
> 
> [1] http://docgist.nawroth.se/?dropbox-2898173%2Fcdi%2520eg%2Fmeetings%2F2013-11-18_EG-meeting.asc
> 
> Antoine Sabot-Durand /@antoine_sd
> ———————————————
> CDI co-spec lead
> CDI eco-system development
> Agorava tech lead
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cdi-dev mailing list
> cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev




More information about the cdi-dev mailing list