[cdi-dev] [JBoss JIRA] (CDI-414) Support for "self" injection
Mark Struberg (JIRA)
issues at jboss.org
Mon Aug 18 14:57:30 EDT 2014
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-414?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12993685#comment-12993685 ]
Mark Struberg commented on CDI-414:
-----------------------------------
Oh, I did not look at the error message but only at Arjans comment
{quote}
Unfortunately using CDI and @Inject this doesn't work. Weld for instance fails the deployment and logs
{quote}
Of course, with @Dependent scoped beans it will fail because of cyclic injection. If it works for any @NormalScoped beans in Weld, then all is fine!.
In that case I don't think we need to clarify anything. It's perfectly clear from the current spec that cyclic dependencies of @Dependent scoped beans is intentionally not supported.
> Support for "self" injection
> ----------------------------
>
> Key: CDI-414
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-414
> Project: CDI Specification Issues
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Resolution
> Reporter: arjan tijms
>
> Many features of CDI and EJB work by means of a proxy that intercepts calls and adds 'aspects'. In Java it's however not possible to decorate the {{this}} pointer, so methods called on the same bean instance from within a method in the bean do not get their 'aspects' applied.
> This is a well known limitation, but in EJB it's possible to work around this by injecting a bean into itself. E.g.
> {code}
> @Stateless
> public class Foo {
> @EJB
> private Foo self;
> // ...
> }
> {code}
> Also see http://adam-bien.com/roller/abien/entry/how_to_self_invoke_ejb
> Unfortunately using CDI and {{@Inject}} this doesn't work. Weld for instance fails the deployment and logs:
> {noformat}
> WELD-001443 Pseudo scoped bean has circular dependencies.
> {noformat}
> See also: http://adam-bien.com/roller/abien/entry/inject_vs_ejb
> Although there are workarounds, it would be great if {{@Inject}} in combination with CDI could support self injection as well.
> With that projects migrating from {{@EJB}} to {{@Inject}} can do so more easily and the capability can be convenient for new projects as well (e.g. calling two separate {{@Transactional}} methods from a single method without being required to create a new bean).
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2.6#6264)
More information about the cdi-dev
mailing list