[cdi-dev] Do we already have a kind of CDI SE in 1.1+ ?
Jozef Hartinger
jharting at redhat.com
Fri Dec 19 06:24:10 EST 2014
Interesting idea (for CDI 1.2 containers running in SE). As you wrote
for CDI 2.0 we need much more.
On 12/19/2014 12:03 PM, Antoine Sabot-Durand wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> As I said during last meeting I was puzzled by the non use of CDI and
> CDIProvider to address CDI boot in Java SE.
>
> I just made a small test adding this class to weld-se :
>
> public class WeldSEProvider extends WeldProvider {
>
> private static boolean firstTime = true;
>
> @Override
> public CDI<Object> getCDI() {
> if (firstTime) {
> new Weld().initialize();
> firstTime = false;
> }
>
> return super.getCDI();
> }
>
> }
>
> and replaced the content of
> META-INF/services/javax.enterprise.inject.spi.CDIProvider by my provider
>
> org.jboss.weld.environment.se.WeldSEProvider
>
> Using this new version of Weld-se in my project Iw as able to boot CDI
> without implementation classes :
>
> public class Main {
>
> public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception {
> CDI cdi = CDI.current();
> BeanManager bm = cdi.getBeanManager();
>
> }
>
> }
>
> Code is available in my weld fork :
> https://github.com/antoinesd/weld-core/blob/2.2-SE/environments/se/core/src/main/java/org/jboss/weld/environment/se/WeldSEProvider.java
>
> Similar CDIProvider can be written for OWB as well.
>
> I may have missed something, but I think we can figure out something
> like that to provide SE support in CDI today, even if it’s not as
> complete as the one we plan to push in CDI 2.0
>
> Antoine
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/cdi-dev/attachments/20141219/865e4038/attachment.html
More information about the cdi-dev
mailing list