[cdi-dev] Ordering of AfterTypeDiscovery#getAlternatives() et al

[Romain Manni-Bucau]

hi

2014-12-22 9:23 GMT+01:00 Jozef Hartinger <jharting at redhat.com>:
>
> On 12/20/2014 11:26 AM, Mark Struberg wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> If I have a
>>
>>
>> @Priority(100)
>> public class MyAlternative implements Foo ..
>>
>> and
>>
>>
>> @Priority(101)
>> public class ABetterAlternative implements Foo ..
>>
>>
>> Then ABetterAlternative will finally be chosen.
>>
>> This ordering can be changed via AfterTypeDiscovery#getAlternatives().
>>
>> But the spec only says "returns the ordered list of enabled alternatives for the application.."
>>
>> But it does NOT define in which sorting this list is ordered ;)
>>
>> In OWB we hat the 'most important' alternative come first. It seems in Weld it is the other way around.
> What sorting do you use for interceptors and decorators?
>>

until yesterday the same as for runtime

>> I have no problem with changing this in OWB, but I would like to get this clarified in our JavaDocs and spec.
> Agreed. Go ahead and file an issue.
>>
>> LieGrue,
>> strub
>> _______________________________________________
>> cdi-dev mailing list
>> cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
>>
>> Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the code under the Apache License, Version 2 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other intellectual property rights inherent in such information.
>
> _______________________________________________
> cdi-dev mailing list
> cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
>
> Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the code under the Apache License, Version 2 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other intellectual property rights inherent in such information.