[cdi-dev] TCK and spec question

Mark Struberg struberg at yahoo.de
Mon Dec 22 03:33:44 EST 2014

No you can NOT I fear.

How do you make sure that the AnnotatedType someone added doesn't get changed later? We have no whatever control over it. If some programmer  like to make it mutable, well then it is that way and we have no chance to detect that :(
Imo the only thing we can do is to point programmers to the fact that this is stupid -> non-portable behaviour.


> On Monday, 22 December 2014, 9:29, Jozef Hartinger <jharting at redhat.com> wrote:
> > 
> On 12/21/2014 09:47 PM, Mark Struberg wrote:
>>  Hi!
>>  I just came across this little sentence in the spec
>>  11.5.6 "If any ProcessAnnotatedType method is called outside of the 
> observer method invocation, an IllegalStateException is thrown."
>>  I don't believe such a limitation helps much. What about extensions who 
> do a setAnnotatedType and change this instance in a later phase?
> Such as?
>>    We have no whatever chance to prevent this anyway.
> We can prevent that by throwing the exception, rather than silently 
> ignoring that the extension is doing something wrong.
>>  So why not just say that if a CDI System Event gets modified outside of the 
> method it gets injected into then non portable behaviour results.
>>  LieGrue,
>>  strub
>>  _______________________________________________
>>  cdi-dev mailing list
>>  cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>  https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
>>  Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the 
> code under the Apache License, Version 2 
> (http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas provided 
> on this list, the provider waives all patent and other intellectual property 
> rights inherent in such information.

More information about the cdi-dev mailing list