[cdi-dev] @Alternative without extends or implements?

Martin Kouba mkouba at redhat.com
Mon Dec 22 07:26:29 EST 2014

Yes, it does not make much sense. Yet it's legal and should work. So 
feel free to create a new TCK Enhancement issue...


Dne 20.12.2014 v 11:16 Mark Struberg napsal(a):
> Hi!
> Some TCK tests have @Alternative classes which neither extend nor implement a class.
> Of course they explicitly extend Object.class, but that does not really make sense, doesn't it?
> LieGrue,
> strub
> _______________________________________________
> cdi-dev mailing list
> cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
> Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the code under the Apache License, Version 2 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other intellectual property rights inherent in such information.

More information about the cdi-dev mailing list