[cdi-dev] Would @PostActivate, @PrePassivate and @Remove make sense in JSR 250 ?

arjan tijms arjan.tijms at gmail.com
Sun Dec 28 11:21:17 EST 2014


Hi,

On Sun, Dec 28, 2014 at 1:52 PM, John D. Ament <john.d.ament at gmail.com>
wrote:

> EJBs work off of a pool of objects and these life cycle methods are
> typically used (from the use cases I've dealt with them) to initiate or
> destroy some end user data for the context in which they are used.
>

@PrePassivate/@PostActivate are used with @Stateful beans, which being
unique instances are far less likely to be pooled. Pools are mostly used
for @Stateless beans (if pools are used at all, the spec doesn't mandate
those).

Kind regards,
Arjan Tijms



>
> I think you might be thinking of PostConstruct/PreDestroy which match to
> the CDI/ManagedBean paradigm better.  There's no pool of these objects
> around, they simply get created and destroyed when done.  For each of the
> scopes you mentioned, I would use a PostConstruct/PreDestroy method to do
> the same thing.
>
> John
>
> On Sun Dec 28 2014 at 7:39:14 AM Antonio Goncalves <
> antonio.goncalves at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I was playing with @SessionScoped beans... and wondered if @PostActivate,
>> @PrePassivate and @Remove would make sense in JSR 250 ?
>>
>> At the moment these annotations belong to the javax.ejb package and are
>> only used in @Stateful EJBs. With CDI scopes, we end up with a few
>> "stateful" scopes (@SessionScoped, but also @ConversationScoped,
>> @ViewScoped...) so why not having the same functionality in CDI ?
>> @PreDestroy and @PostConstruct are already part of JSR 250. So why not
>> having @PostActivate and @PrePassivate as well so they could be used in
>> every bean ?
>>
>> BTW, while I was playing with @SessionScoped beans, I asked Antoine to
>> show me how to remove a bean from the session. It's only a few lines of
>> code, but again, why not having a @Remove annotation that does that (the
>> exact same one of javax.ejb.Remove) ?
>>
>> To summarize, why not taking some of those stateful EJB concerns back to
>> JSR 250 so they could be used anywhere ?
>>
>> Any thoughts ?
>>
>> --
>> Antonio Goncalves
>> Software architect, Java Champion and Pluralsight author
>>
>> Web site <http://www.antoniogoncalves.org> | Twitter
>> <http://twitter.com/agoncal> | LinkedIn
>> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/agoncal> | Pluralsight
>> <http://pluralsight.com/training/Authors/Details/antonio-goncalves> | Paris
>> JUG <http://www.parisjug.org> | Devoxx France <http://www.devoxx.fr>
>>  _______________________________________________
>> cdi-dev mailing list
>> cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
>>
>> Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the
>> code under the Apache License, Version 2 (http://www.apache.org/
>> licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas provided on this list,
>> the provider waives all patent and other intellectual property rights
>> inherent in such information.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cdi-dev mailing list
> cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
>
> Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the
> code under the Apache License, Version 2 (
> http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas
> provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other
> intellectual property rights inherent in such information.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/cdi-dev/attachments/20141228/0c76095f/attachment.html 


More information about the cdi-dev mailing list