[cdi-dev] [JBoss JIRA] (CDI-404) adding bean-defining annotations for Interceptor while setting bean-discovery-mode="annotated"

[Antoine Sabot-Durand (JIRA)]

    [ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-404?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12938880#comment-12938880 ] 

Antoine Sabot-Durand commented on CDI-404:
------------------------------------------

I think Option 1 in [~arnelim] comment should be chosen : {{@Interceptor}} and {{@Decorator}} should become bean defining annotation. We'll propbably extend the annotations list for bean defining annotation with CDI-406, so why not add these 2 as well ?
                
> adding  bean-defining annotations for Interceptor while setting bean-discovery-mode="annotated"
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CDI-404
>                 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-404
>             Project: CDI Specification Issues
>          Issue Type: Feature Request
>          Components: Beans
>    Affects Versions: 1.1.PFD
>            Reporter: Tang Yong
>             Fix For: 1.2 Proposed
>
>
> [1] and [2] has reported an issue about
> bean-discovery-mode="annotated". Although there are some workarounds for
> the issue, I think that in the future, we should support interceptor
> implict scanning while an user uses bean-discovery-mode="annotated".
> Apparently, just as bean-discovery-mode="annotated", CDI Spec and
> Interceptor Spec are disconnected.
> [1]:https://java.net/jira/browse/GLASSFISH-20667
> [2]:http://stackoverflow.com/questions/17258639/interceptor-issue-with-java-ee7
> About detailed discussion, please seeing the following,
> https://java.net/projects/javaee-spec/lists/users/archive/2013-09/message/7

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira