[cdi-dev] Renaming the Spec for CDI 2.0 ?

[Antoine Sabot-Durand]

Ok, so let’s do it.

PS: Speaking of renaming I often dream of stealing Dr Emmet Brown's DeLorean to go back in time and change the ‘CDI’ acronym when I see this page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CDI. When I wake up and realize it’s too late ;).


Le 2 juil. 2014 à 13:46, Pete Muir <pmuir at redhat.com> a écrit :

> 
> On 2 Jul 2014, at 12:45, Arne Limburg <arne.limburg at openknowledge.de> wrote:
> 
>> Hi Antoine,
>> 
>> 
>> No problem with that. A question comes to my mind on that: What is the
>> official name of JSR-330 (@Inject)?
> 
> "JSR 330: Dependency Injection for Java"
> 
>> We should not clash with it. But I
>> guess, at least the "Contexts" is missing from their name.
> 
> So it seems a good transition to me.
> 
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> Arne
>> 
>> Am 02.07.14 13:40 schrieb "Antoine Sabot-Durand" unter
>> <antoine at sabot-durand.net>:
>> 
>>> Hi, 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> As we intend to include Java SE support, Martin propose to rename the
>>> complete name of the spec « Contexts and Dependency Injection for Java EE
>>> » by removing the EE. New name would be « Contexts and Dependency
>>> Injection for Java ».
>>> 
>>> On the principle I¹m ok with that except if it brings issue with the JCP
>>> or Java EE 8 EC. What do you think ?
>>> 
>>> Antoine
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> cdi-dev mailing list
>> cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 495 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
Url : http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/cdi-dev/attachments/20140702/e24dbea9/attachment.bin