[cdi-dev] [JBoss JIRA] (CDI-280) clarify usage of 'bean' term usage in the spec

[Antoine Sabot-Durand (JIRA)]

    [ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-280?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12952356#comment-12952356 ] 

Antoine Sabot-Durand commented on CDI-280:
------------------------------------------

I won't go back in terminology war. I'm the newbie here and understand my user / usage oriented pov is not widely shared ;).
Anyway, I think we're too late to produce a quality work on this. I propose we postpone this lexical dispute for 2.0 where most of the spec will more deeply reviewed. So I think we should remove this ticket from 1.2.
WDYT?
                
> clarify usage of 'bean' term usage in the spec
> ----------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CDI-280
>                 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-280
>             Project: CDI Specification Issues
>          Issue Type: Clarification
>            Reporter: Mark Struberg
>            Assignee: Antoine Sabot-Durand
>              Labels: CDI_api_chge, CDI_spec_chge
>             Fix For: 1.2 Proposed
>
>
> We should go to the spec and look up all 'bean' words as they are 5 different meaning the word 'bean' is used for
> * The Bean<T> extends Contextual<T>. Should be referred as 'Bean' or 'CDI Bean'
> * The class which gets scanned. Should be referred as 'Bean Class' to
> * The instance stored in the context. Should be referred to as 'Contextual Instance'
> * The proxy for a Contextual Instance should be referred to as 'Contextual Reference'
> * The type of an injection point should be referred to as 'InjectionPoint Type'

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira