[cdi-dev] [JBoss JIRA] (CDI-320) Clarify whether ProcessAnnotatedType should be fired for annotations
Antoine Sabot-Durand (JIRA)
issues at jboss.org
Thu Mar 20 12:12:10 EDT 2014
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-320?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12954679#comment-12954679 ]
Antoine Sabot-Durand commented on CDI-320:
------------------------------------------
Seriously [~jharting]?
I must admit I found this sentence not very clear... Thanks both for that discovery. I remove it from the PR.
> Clarify whether ProcessAnnotatedType should be fired for annotations
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CDI-320
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-320
> Project: CDI Specification Issues
> Issue Type: Clarification
> Components: Portable Extensions
> Reporter: Ron Šmeral
> Assignee: Antoine Sabot-Durand
> Labels: CDI_spec_chge, Ready_to_fix
> Fix For: 1.2 Proposed
>
>
> It should be stated clearly whether {{ProcessAnnotatedType}} should be fired for annotations.
> Currently, *11.5.6 ProcessAnnotatedType event* says:
> {quote}
> The container must fire an event, before it processes a type, for each:
> * Java class, interface or enum in a bean archive,
> {quote}
> The word "annotation" has been introduced into the above line and later reverted.
> {quote}
> * Annotated type added by {{BeforeBeanDiscovery.addAnnotatedType()}},
> {quote}
> The wording used here, however, doesn't exclude the option of the annotated type being an Annotation.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
More information about the cdi-dev
mailing list