[cdi-dev] [JBoss JIRA] (CDI-407) Specifiy @Named @Alternatives

[Thomas Andraschko (JIRA)]

    [ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-407?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13013511#comment-13013511 ] 

Thomas Andraschko commented on CDI-407:
---------------------------------------

Yep, thats what i expected.
In this case, is there any reason to still install/configure A as active bean?
As there is no qualifier or stereotype available, it would be possible to automatically install B as @Named("a") without explicity giving it a name.
Or do i miss something here?

@Named("a") is a workaround but feels "ugly" and you always have to synchronize the names.


> Specifiy @Named @Alternatives
> -----------------------------
>
>                 Key: CDI-407
>                 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-407
>             Project: CDI Specification Issues
>          Issue Type: Clarification
>          Components: Beans, Inheritance and Specialization
>            Reporter: Thomas Andraschko
>
> It's actually a must-have for product development and a common case.
> We would like to have multiple implementations in our core and just activate them via alternative.
> I talked with struberg and its currently not defined in the specs.
> e.g.
> @Named public class A
> @Named @Alternative public class B extends A
> What should acutally happen if B is activated via beans.xml?
> IMO B should be available in EL via "a" and "b".



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.1#6329)