[cdi-dev] microbenchmark for CDI performance

[John D. Ament]

Mark,

Did you mean to send this to weld-dev instead of cdi-dev? (though I'm not
sure if that list is still maintained)

At first glance, these look odd:

persistence-api-1.0.2.jar

validation-api-1.0.0.GA.jar

jboss-ejb-api_3.1_spec-1.0.2.Final.jar

jboss-el-api_3.0_spec-1.0.0.Alpha1.jar


I don't recall them coming in when running SE.

On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 5:59 AM, Mark Struberg <struberg at yahoo.de> wrote:

> Hi!
>
> Weld folks, I need some help with a micro benchmark:
>
> You know we've talked about disk footprint in SE, so I hacked together a
> small microbenchmark and as a side effect we also got what is really needed
> to have CDI running
>
> https://github.com/struberg/cdi-performance
>
> I'm curious about missing some dependency excludes for Weld.
>
> could you please run
>
> $> mvn clean dependency:copy-dependencies -DincludeScope=compile -PWeld
> -Dweld.version=2.2.5.Final
> $> ls -al target/dependency/
>
> and tell me which dependencies can be without having some CDI
> functionality missing?
>
> Feel free to pimp the pom and ship a pull request.
>
>
> txs and LieGrue,
> strub
> _______________________________________________
> cdi-dev mailing list
> cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
>
> Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the
> code under the Apache License, Version 2 (
> http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas
> provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other
> intellectual property rights inherent in such information.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/cdi-dev/attachments/20141021/2d31f469/attachment.html