[cdi-dev] CDI 2.0 first Face to face meeting feedbac

[Antoine Sabot-Durand]

What would be the interest of having CDI object to call getBeanManager() instead of having the bean manager directly ?

Antoine

> Le 23 oct. 2014 à 03:13, John D. Ament <john.d.ament at gmail.com> a écrit :
> 
> Hi Antoine,
> 
> For the SE feature, I think the return type on the initialize() methods should be CDI instead of BeanManager.  What do you think?
> 
> John
> 
> On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 6:55 AM, Antoine Sabot-Durand <antoine at sabot-durand.net <mailto:antoine at sabot-durand.net>> wrote:
> Hi guys, 
> 
> 
> New post on the blog :  Check what was discussed in our last week F2F meeting.
> 
> http://www.cdi-spec.org/news/2014/10/20/CDI-2_0-first-face-to-face-meeting-feedback/ <http://www.cdi-spec.org/news/2014/10/20/CDI-2_0-first-face-to-face-meeting-feedback/>
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Antoine
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cdi-dev mailing list
> cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org <mailto:cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org>
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev <https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev>
> 
> Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the code under the Apache License, Version 2 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html <http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html>). For all other ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other intellectual property rights inherent in such information.
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/cdi-dev/attachments/20141023/113169f6/attachment-0001.html