[cdi-dev] CDI 2.0 first Face to face meeting feedbac

[Mark Struberg]

I think the only sane thing is to give guarantees for exactly 1 BeanManager at the same time in a JVM.

Supporting multiple BeanManagers could be done by wiring up an own ClassLoader hierarchy pretty easily. But I have not yet seen any requirement to do so in any productive project so far.


And changing impls to support the requirement to support different active BeanManagers on the same Thread is a task for really freaky minds...

LieGrue,
strub



On Thursday, 23 October 2014, 13:39, John D. Ament <john.d.ament at gmail.com> wrote:


>
>
>I could see this being problematic for implementations to deal with:
>
>
>ContainerBoot boot = ...;
>BeanManager beanManager1 = boot.initialize();
>CDI.current();
>BeanManager beanManager2 = boot.initialize();
>CDI.current();
>
>
>I see the second call to CDI.current() failing, since it should end up bound to a thread.  If we instead return back a reference to CDI here, we know which instance we're dealing with and avoid the underlying threading problem.
>
>
>John
>
>
>On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 5:51 AM, Antoine Sabot-Durand <antoine at sabot-durand.net> wrote:
>
>What would be the interest of having CDI object to call getBeanManager() instead of having the bean manager directly ?
>>
>>
>>Antoine
>>
>>Le 23 oct. 2014 à 03:13, John D. Ament <john.d.ament at gmail.com> a écrit :
>>>
>>>
>>>Hi Antoine,
>>>
>>>
>>>For the SE feature, I think the return type on the initialize() methods should be CDI instead of BeanManager.  What do you think?
>>>
>>>
>>>John
>>>
>>>
>>>On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 6:55 AM, Antoine Sabot-Durand <antoine at sabot-durand.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>Hi guys, 
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>New post on the blog :  Check what was discussed in our last week F2F meeting.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>http://www.cdi-spec.org/news/2014/10/20/CDI-2_0-first-face-to-face-meeting-feedback/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Regards,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Antoine
>>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>cdi-dev mailing list
>>>>cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>>https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
>>>>
>>>>Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the code under the Apache License, Version 2 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other intellectual property rights inherent in such information.
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>cdi-dev mailing list
>cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org
>https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
>
>Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the code under the Apache License, Version 2 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other intellectual property rights inherent in such information.
>
>