[cdi-dev] Tools : Google Drive vs Asciidoc and Github

[Filipe Portes]

agreed


On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 11:36 AM, John D. Ament <john.d.ament at gmail.com>
wrote:

> +1
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 6:22 AM, Antoine Sabot-Durand <
> antoine at sabot-durand.net> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>>
>> To pursue the discussion we had during last meeting, I really think we
>> should use both tools for the workshop. that’s how I see things :
>>
>> In early stage in the workshop the working doc is changing fast and could
>> probably content ideas that will disappear in future version (impossible or
>> breaking backward compatibility).
>> This phase needs fast collaboration between people knowing that the doc
>> content is volatile and more in “brain storm” than in “part of the final
>> spec” mode. For these reason I think we should set this working phase in
>> Google Drive. It will be easier to collaborate synchronously on the doc and
>> separate the very early draft to more advance phase.
>>
>> When an agreement (we have to define that yet)  will be reached on this
>> doc, it will be converted in Asciidoc (the plugin works nicely) and
>> integrated to the spec website. The change will course continue but if we
>> didn’t missed big mistake there will be less of them and they could be done
>> thru PR.
>>
>> WDYT ?
>>
>> Antoine
>> _______________________________________________
>> cdi-dev mailing list
>> cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
>>
>> Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the
>> code under the Apache License, Version 2 (
>> http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas
>> provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other
>> intellectual property rights inherent in such information.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cdi-dev mailing list
> cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
>
> Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the
> code under the Apache License, Version 2 (
> http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas
> provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other
> intellectual property rights inherent in such information.
>



-- 
Filipe Portes - @filipeportes
Senior Java EE/Web
JUGLeader Gojava <http://www.gojava.org/> - @gojava
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/cdi-dev/attachments/20140905/1370bd3e/attachment-0001.html