[cdi-dev] Enhancement proposition to JSR 330

Antoine Sabot-Durand antoine at sabot-durand.net
Mon Sep 8 10:09:45 EDT 2014


Werner,

Java EE 8 target is JDK 8 as we said before. But te goal of this document is not to discuss with Bob and Juergen how they should use JDK 8 within their spec, but to see if are willing to discuss our suggestion. When we’ll find a general agreement it will be useful to go into such details.

Antoine


> Le 8 sept. 2014 à 12:20, Werner Keil <werner.keil at gmail.com> a écrit :
> 
> Antoine/all,
> 
> Thanks for sharing. I also had a discussion (in his own Spring blog) with Jürgen mainly about modularity, and the JDK minimum requirements for Spring 4.x. He confirmed, the "core" components of Spring 4.1 still run under as low as Java 6, while some modules that can be dynamically (Spring-DM aka OSGi;-) added may directly refer to Java 8, in which case you must run SE 8 or higher.
> 
> So while for Java 6/7 or below version of @Inject.next this:
> 
> public interface Provider<T> extends Iterable<T> {
>   /**
>    * Provides a fully-constructed and injected instance of {@code T}.
>    */
>   T get();
> [...]
> 
> looks fine, it seemed more than consequent, if you  did
> 
> public interface Provider<T> extends Iterable<T>, Supplier<T>  {
> [...]
> 
> in a Java 8+ case;-)
> 
> Even without looking at Lambdas here in greater detail, it reused what Java SE 8 introduced.
> 
> Again, that is something you, Bob, Jürgen and maybe the EE 8 Spec Leads should discuss, what the reasonable minimum requirements for  @Inject.next are, if it's SE 8 or a lower version, though those of course may always stick with the previous ones...
> 
> Werner
> 
> On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 12:06 PM, <cdi-dev-request at lists.jboss.org <mailto:cdi-dev-request at lists.jboss.org>> wrote:
> Send cdi-dev mailing list submissions to
>         cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org <mailto:cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org>
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>         https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev <https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev>
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>         cdi-dev-request at lists.jboss.org <mailto:cdi-dev-request at lists.jboss.org>
> 
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>         cdi-dev-owner at lists.jboss.org <mailto:cdi-dev-owner at lists.jboss.org>
> 
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of cdi-dev digest..."
> 
> 
> Today's Topics:
> 
>    1. [JBoss JIRA] (CDI-456) fix Bean#getBeanClass() definition
>       (Romain Manni-Bucau (JIRA))
>    2. Enhancement proposition to JSR 330 (Antoine Sabot-Durand)
>    3. Re: With the end of Java Config... (Werner Keil)
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Message: 2
> Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2014 12:03:36 +0200
> From: Antoine Sabot-Durand <antoine at sabot-durand.net <mailto:antoine at sabot-durand.net>>
> Subject: [cdi-dev] Enhancement proposition to JSR 330
> To: cdi-dev <cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org <mailto:cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org>>
> Message-ID: <D8CD5D26-82DB-4F64-89C5-93AD467FBC0B at sabot-durand.net <mailto:D8CD5D26-82DB-4F64-89C5-93AD467FBC0B at sabot-durand.net>>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> 
> I received an answer from Bob Lee (off list). He likes te idea of us providing a proposal document. So I worked on it this WE.
> Here it is : https://docs.google.com/document/d/1KCzqodA8uzXED5DJrEUyl0x3dOUB5mBwL4KcV8xUY_w/edit?usp=sharing <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1KCzqodA8uzXED5DJrEUyl0x3dOUB5mBwL4KcV8xUY_w/edit?usp=sharing> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1KCzqodA8uzXED5DJrEUyl0x3dOUB5mBwL4KcV8xUY_w/edit?usp=sharing <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1KCzqodA8uzXED5DJrEUyl0x3dOUB5mBwL4KcV8xUY_w/edit?usp=sharing>>
> 
> Your comments and proposal are most welcome. I propose we discuss this point during our next meeting, and if we agree on the final content send it asap to have Bob and Juergen feeling about these suggestion.
> 
> 
> Antoine
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/cdi-dev/attachments/20140908/607a6499/attachment-0001.html <http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/cdi-dev/attachments/20140908/607a6499/attachment-0001.html>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cdi-dev mailing list
> cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org <mailto:cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org>
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev <https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev>
> 
> Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the code under the Apache License, Version 2 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html <http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html>).  For all other ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other intellectual property rights inherent in such information.
> 
> End of cdi-dev Digest, Vol 46, Issue 42
> ***************************************
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cdi-dev mailing list
> cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
> 
> Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the code under the Apache License, Version 2 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other intellectual property rights inherent in such information.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/cdi-dev/attachments/20140908/8f6c1acd/attachment.html 


More information about the cdi-dev mailing list