[cdi-dev] [JBoss JIRA] (CDI-460) Support repeatable qualifiers

[Antonin Stefanutti (JIRA)]

Antonin Stefanutti created CDI-460:
--------------------------------------

             Summary: Support repeatable qualifiers
                 Key: CDI-460
                 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-460
             Project: CDI Specification Issues
          Issue Type: Feature Request
          Components: Portable Extensions
    Affects Versions: 2.0 (discussion)
            Reporter: Antonin Stefanutti


In CDI 1.2, it is not explicitly stated whether altering the annotation-based metadata in a way to add multiple annotations of the same type is possible or not. That situation occurs with the following combinations:

{{AnnotatedType.getAnnotations()}} and {{ProcessAnnotatedType.setAnnotatedType(AnnotatedType at)}},
{{BeanAttributes.getQualifiers()}}, and {{ProcessBeanAttributes.setBeanAttributes(BeanAttributes ba)}},
{{InjectionPoint.getQualifiers}} and {{ProcessInjectionPoint.setInjectionPoint(InjectionPoint ip)}}.

Being able to decorate these metadata with repeating annotations enables powerful and elegant use cases as discussed in [OWB-1004|https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1004], that is the ability to use an annotation both as a CDI qualifier and a metadata provider during injection.

Given that Java 8 provides support for [repeating annotations|http://docs.oracle.com/javase/tutorial/java/annotations/repeating.html], it seems logical to have repeating annotations supported at the CDI SPI level. Tough, that's important to have that support explicitly stated and specified in CDI.

Indeed, while Weld permits metadata alteration with repeating annotations, OpenWebBeans does not for the moment though developers understand the need and are willing to open that behavior as discussed in [OWB-1004|https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1004] as long as that support will be made explicit in the specification.

That applies as well for {{EventMetadata.getQualifiers}} in _read-only_.




--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.1#6329)