[cdi-dev] CDI F2F meeting

Tue Sep 23 02:42:35 EDT 2014

I will not be able to attend :(
I am doing this in my free time and I have no vacation left for this year.

Regards,
Thorben

--
*Thorben Janssen*

@thjanssen123 <https://twitter.com/thjanssen123>
www.thoughts-on-java.org

2014-09-22 16:18 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg <struberg at yahoo.de>:

> I think I can make it.
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
> On Monday, 22 September 2014, 15:46, John D. Ament <john.d.ament at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>
> >
> >
> >I have to side with Antonio on this one.  For me, getting a visa and
> passport together in 4 weeks time is just not realistic, especially for a
> two day trip to Czech Republic.  Hopefully we can do some small kick off at
> JavaOne though :-)
> >
> >
> >On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 9:30 AM, Antonio Goncalves <
> antonio.goncalves at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >Thanks.
> >>
> >>
> >>Unfortunately I won't be able to attend on October, but if you take my
> wish (and others?) in consideration and plan another meeting on
> Friday/Saturday later in 2015, I will be pleased to assist.
> >>
> >>
> >>Antonio
> >>
> >>
> >>On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 3:24 PM, Antoine Sabot-Durand <
> antoine at sabot-durand.net> wrote:
> >>
> >>Hi Antonio,
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>In an ideal world we should have done something like your suggestion or
> at least consult people before planning this. Now there are constraints
> that go beyond our reach here. The first one being that these dates were
> more or less decided before the EG formation (even before the CDI 2.0
> proposal was accepted by the JCP).
> >>>I know it’s not perfect, but we have this opportunity to meet at this
> time and place. Should we organise other meeting later (in 2015), we’ll try
> to take your in put into consideration.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>Antoine
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>Le 22 sept. 2014 à 13:03, Antonio Goncalves <
> antonio.goncalves at gmail.com> a écrit :
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>Hi all,
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>Face to faces meetings are a really great idea. But let me give you my
> 2 cents about this :
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>Most self-employed contractors, like me, need to pay for the travel
> and expenses. Which it's fine, I do not expect RedHat to pay for this ;o)
> But on top of that, we need to take a few days off work, which increases
> the amount of the bill. In this case, Wednesday/Thursday which are in the
> middle of the week (and leaves Friday off (another day without billing), or
> returning to work (which is a bit rough).
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>Why not having those meetings on Friday/Saturday ? Contractors would
> only loose a day of work, and can enjoy the week-end by relaxing on Sunday.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>What do you all think ?
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>Antonio
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 12:39 PM, Antoine Sabot-Durand <
> antoine at sabot-durand.net> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>Hi All,
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>To have a “physical” kick off for CDI 2.0 we organised a Face to Face
> meeting the 15th and 16th October. This meeting will take place in Brno Red
> Hat office (in Czech Republic). All the community is invited
> >>>>>Red Hat will offer lunches for the 2 days and dinner on the 15th.
> Transportation and hotel is note included
> >>>>>Agenda will include :
> >>>>>
> >>>>>- Work on the different workshop, starting with the less obvious
> (parts, Contexts and SPI evolution)
> >>>>>- How to contribute to TCK and RI
> >>>>>- Start to specify new features
> >>>>>- Roadmap for Weld 3.0 (the CDI RI)
> >>>>>
> >>>>>We are off course open to other topics link to CDI and CDI 2.0.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>If you are interested or have question please let me know. We’ll talk
> about this on the next wednesday meeting.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Antoine
> >>>>>_______________________________________________
> >>>>>cdi-dev mailing list
> >>>>>cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org
> >>>>>https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses
> the code under the Apache License, Version 2 (
> http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas
> provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other
> intellectual property rights inherent in such information.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>--
> >>>>
> >>>>Antonio Goncalves
> >>>>Software architect, Java Champion and Pluralsight author
> >>>>
> >>>>Web site | Twitter | LinkedIn | Pluralsight | Paris JUG | Devoxx France
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>--
> >>
> >>Antonio Goncalves
> >>Software architect, Java Champion and Pluralsight author
> >>
> >>Web site | Twitter | LinkedIn | Pluralsight | Paris JUG | Devoxx France
> >>_______________________________________________
> >>cdi-dev mailing list
> >>cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org
> >>https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
> >>
> >>Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the
> code under the Apache License, Version 2 (
> http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas
> provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other
> intellectual property rights inherent in such information.
> >>
> >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >cdi-dev mailing list
> >cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org
> >https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
> >
> >Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the
> code under the Apache License, Version 2 (
> http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas
> provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other
> intellectual property rights inherent in such information.
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> cdi-dev mailing list
> cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
>
> Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the
> code under the Apache License, Version 2 (
> http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas
> provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other
> intellectual property rights inherent in such information.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/cdi-dev/attachments/20140923/d7716fa8/attachment.html 