[cdi-dev] where is defined javax.enterprise.context.conversation.id?

Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibucau at gmail.com
Fri Jan 2 03:51:44 EST 2015


Wow it was not trivial to find, thank you Tomas!

BTW (and mainly for future): is it a right idea to use '.' in names cause of EL?


Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau


2015-01-02 8:15 GMT+01:00 Tomas Remes <tremes at redhat.com>:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I've checked the related TCK test and it seems to me valid. In CDI spec there is:
>
> "6.7.5. The Conversation interface
> The container provides a built-in bean with bean type Conversation , scope @RequestScoped ,
> and qualifier @Default , named javax.enterprise.context.conversation ."
>
> Tom
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Mark Struberg" <struberg at yahoo.de>
> To: "Antonio Goncalves" <antonio.goncalves at gmail.com>, "Romain Manni-Bucau" <rmannibucau at gmail.com>
> Cc: cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org
> Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2014 10:57:28 AM
> Subject: Re: [cdi-dev] where is defined javax.enterprise.context.conversation.id?
>
> cid is a different thing. But I did nowhere (spec and api) find the one mentioned by Romain.
> So I think it's not specified and we need to exclude this test.
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>
> On Monday, 29 December 2014, 21:41, Antonio Goncalves <antonio.goncalves at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>>
>>
>>Nothing in JSF nor in Servlet, but in CDI 1.2 Specification :
>>
>>
>>6.7.4. Conversation context lifecycle
>>(...)
>>The long-running conversation associated with a
>>request may be propagated to any Servlet request via use of a request parameter named cid
>>containing the unique identifier of the conversation. In this case, the application must manage this
>>request parameter.
>>(...)
>>
>>This is accomplished via use of a request parameter named cid containing the unique
>>identifier of the conversation.
>>(...)
>>
>>
>>
>>On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 7:54 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibucau at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>Hi guys
>>>
>>>didnt find in CDI and JSF PDFs where is defined
>>>"javax.enterprise.context.conversation.id". Seems it should be
>>>available in ELs.
>>>
>>>Do you have any pointer please?
>>>
>>>
>>>Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>@rmannibucau
>>>http://www.tomitribe.com
>>>http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
>>>https://github.com/rmannibucau
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>cdi-dev mailing list
>>>cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
>>>
>>>Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the code under the Apache License, Version 2 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other intellectual property rights inherent in such information.
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>--
>>
>>Antonio Goncalves
>>Software architect, Java Champion and Pluralsight author
>>
>>Web site | Twitter | LinkedIn | Pluralsight | Paris JUG | Devoxx France
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>cdi-dev mailing list
>>cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
>>
>>Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the code under the Apache License, Version 2 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other intellectual property rights inherent in such information.
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> cdi-dev mailing list
> cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
>
> Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the code under the Apache License, Version 2 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other intellectual property rights inherent in such information.
>
>



More information about the cdi-dev mailing list