[cdi-dev] [JBoss JIRA] (CDI-496) Clarification (or completion) for interceptor binding to session bean

[Martin Kouba (JIRA)]

    [ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-496?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13029764#comment-13029764 ] 

Martin Kouba commented on CDI-496:
----------------------------------

[~rmannibucau] I believe the contract of a CDI bean of any kind (managed, session bean, producer method, etc.) is explicitly defined (2. Concepts):
{quote}
A bean comprises the following attributes:
* A (nonempty) set of bean types
* A (nonempty) set of qualifiers
* A scope
* Optionally, a bean name
* A set of interceptor bindings
* A bean implementation
{quote}

> Clarification (or completion) for interceptor binding to session bean
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CDI-496
>                 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-496
>             Project: CDI Specification Issues
>          Issue Type: Clarification
>            Reporter: Tomas Remes
>
> It's not clear if the session bean can have interceptor binding and what rules (if any) apply to this case. In the beginning of chapter 9. Interceptor bindings there is following statement:
> {quote}Managed beans and EJB session and message-driven beans support interception.{quote}
> But at the end of "9.3. Binding an interceptor to a bean" There is only:
> {quote}
> If a managed bean has a class-level or method-level interceptor binding, the managed bean must
> be a proxyable bean type, as defined in Section 3.15, “Unproxyable bean types”.
> {quote}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.11#6341)