[cdi-dev] [JBoss JIRA] (CDI-232) Relax requirements for built-in Instance

[Antoine Sabot-Durand (JIRA)]

    [ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-232?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13030240#comment-13030240 ] 

Antoine Sabot-Durand commented on CDI-232:
------------------------------------------

yes [~jharting], that's why I was starting to propose a new way to define the behaviour. Saying that the container doesn't provide all the Instance for all bean type but only check that the Instance you injected is related to a valid bean type. Do you mean that the current behaviour allow me to put a non valid bean type (inject Instance<Foo> where no beans exist with Foo type) ?

> Relax requirements for built-in Instance
> ----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CDI-232
>                 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-232
>             Project: CDI Specification Issues
>          Issue Type: Clarification
>    Affects Versions: 1.1.EDR
>            Reporter: Martin Kouba
>             Fix For: 2.0 (discussion)
>
>
> 5.6.2. The built-in Instance
> {quote}
> The container must provide a built-in bean with:
> * Instance<X> and Provider<X> for every legal bean type X in its set of bean types,
> * every qualifier type in its set of qualifier types,
> {quote}
> This type/qualifier requirements seem to be too strict. Maybe we should omit these and instead force implementation to satisfy every injection point for every legal bean type and corresponding qualifiers found in application... or something like that. I'm not sure about the wording.
> By the way Weld (2.0.0.Alpha2) does not fulfil these requirements at the moment.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.11#6341)