[cdi-dev] [JBoss JIRA] (CDI-232) Relax requirements for built-in Instance

Antoine Sabot-Durand (JIRA) issues at jboss.org
Tue Jan 6 11:08:29 EST 2015


    [ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-232?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13030291#comment-13030291 ] 

Antoine Sabot-Durand commented on CDI-232:
------------------------------------------

So we could reword the paragraph like this

{quote}
The container must provide a built-in bean:
* eligible for all injection point of type Instance<T> and Provider<T>, for any T type and having any set of qualifiers,
* with scope @Dependent,
* with no bean name, and
* an implementation provided automatically by the container.

The built-in implementation must be a passivation capable dependency, as defined in Passivation capable dependencies.
{quote}


> Relax requirements for built-in Instance
> ----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CDI-232
>                 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-232
>             Project: CDI Specification Issues
>          Issue Type: Clarification
>    Affects Versions: 1.1.EDR
>            Reporter: Martin Kouba
>             Fix For: 2.0 (discussion)
>
>
> 5.6.2. The built-in Instance
> {quote}
> The container must provide a built-in bean with:
> * Instance<X> and Provider<X> for every legal bean type X in its set of bean types,
> * every qualifier type in its set of qualifier types,
> {quote}
> This type/qualifier requirements seem to be too strict. Maybe we should omit these and instead force implementation to satisfy every injection point for every legal bean type and corresponding qualifiers found in application... or something like that. I'm not sure about the wording.
> By the way Weld (2.0.0.Alpha2) does not fulfil these requirements at the moment.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.11#6341)


More information about the cdi-dev mailing list