[cdi-dev] [JBoss JIRA] (CDI-496) Clarification (or completion) for interceptor binding to session bean

[Pete Muir (JIRA)]

    [ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-496?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13030493#comment-13030493 ] 

Pete Muir commented on CDI-496:
-------------------------------

The second statement (about proxability) does not affect what beans can be intercepted. The reason session beans are not mentioned here is because the EJB specification defines that the bean must be proxiable.

I don't really understand this issue.

> Clarification (or completion) for interceptor binding to session bean
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CDI-496
>                 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-496
>             Project: CDI Specification Issues
>          Issue Type: Clarification
>          Components: Interceptors
>    Affects Versions: 1.2.Final
>            Reporter: Tomas Remes
>             Fix For: 2.0 (discussion)
>
>
> It's not clear if the session bean can have interceptor binding and what rules (if any) apply to this case. In the beginning of chapter 9. Interceptor bindings there is following statement:
> {quote}Managed beans and EJB session and message-driven beans support interception.{quote}
> But at the end of "9.3. Binding an interceptor to a bean" There is only:
> {quote}
> If a managed bean has a class-level or method-level interceptor binding, the managed bean must
> be a proxyable bean type, as defined in Section 3.15, “Unproxyable bean types”.
> {quote}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.11#6341)