[cdi-dev] [JBoss JIRA] (CDI-496) Clarification (or completion) for interceptor binding to session bean

[Romain Manni-Bucau (JIRA)]

    [ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-496?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13030525#comment-13030525 ] 

Romain Manni-Bucau commented on CDI-496:
----------------------------------------

excepted the CDI container doesnt have to know the EJB actual impl type so how can it validate it? I think it should be done in EJB container - anyway it should be done in EJB container anyway and lifecycle between EJB and CDI container doesnt say today which one would fail first

> Clarification (or completion) for interceptor binding to session bean
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CDI-496
>                 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-496
>             Project: CDI Specification Issues
>          Issue Type: Clarification
>          Components: Interceptors
>    Affects Versions: 1.2.Final
>            Reporter: Tomas Remes
>             Fix For: 2.0 (discussion)
>
>
> It's not clear if the session bean can have interceptor binding and what rules (if any) apply to this case. In the beginning of chapter 9. Interceptor bindings there is following statement:
> {quote}Managed beans and EJB session and message-driven beans support interception.{quote}
> But at the end of "9.3. Binding an interceptor to a bean" There is only:
> {quote}
> If a managed bean has a class-level or method-level interceptor binding, the managed bean must
> be a proxyable bean type, as defined in Section 3.15, “Unproxyable bean types”.
> {quote}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.11#6341)