[cdi-dev] [VOTE] support of implicit bean archive under Java SE

[Thorben Janssen]

+1

--
*Thorben Janssen*

@thjanssen123 <https://twitter.com/thjanssen123>
www.thoughts-on-java.org

2015-06-04 10:31 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg <struberg at yahoo.de>:

> +1 for making it configurable whether or not implicit bean archives should
> get picked up automatically
> +1 for only scanning explicit bean archives in SE mode
>
> +0.5 for having a regexp exclude mechanism for defining classapth entries
> which should *not* get scanned.
> Containers WILL have this. But it might be too much depending on the
> environment you are working in. E.g. for an OSGi environment it might not
> work out that way and a different mechanism is needed.
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
> > Am 03.06.2015 um 18:30 schrieb John D. Ament <john.d.ament at gmail.com>:
> >
> > Ok then -1 from me.
> > The reason I say -1 is because using a boolean is too restrictive.
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 12:29 PM Antoine Sabot-Durand <
> antoine at sabot-durand.net> wrote:
> > Yes. that's the reason why this problem was raised by Jozef: having to
> scan all jars can be very resource consuming.
> >
> > Le mer. 3 juin 2015 à 17:19, John D. Ament <john.d.ament at gmail.com> a
> écrit :
> > Just to clarify, are you saying that by default, only JARs that contain
> META-INF/beans.xml will be scanned.
> > when you set this parameter to true, all JARs are scanned?
> >
> > John
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 10:14 AM Antoine Sabot-Durand <
> antoine at sabot-durand.net> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> >
> > Yesterday during the meeting we had a discussion about implicit bean
> archive support under Java SE.
> > The idea is to have it disabled by default and provide a way to activate
> it thru parameter "javax.enterprise.inject.scan.implicit=true”on command
> line or in the parameter map of the initialize method.
> > Details of the discussion and points of people pro and against this
> support can be found in meeting log :
> >
> >
> http://transcripts.jboss.org/meeting/irc.freenode.org/cdi-dev/2015/cdi-dev.2015-06-02-16.01.log.html
> >
> > I’d like to call for a vote regarding the support of implicit bean
> archive under Java SE.
> >
> > This vote will be open for 72 hrs. Answer +1 (yes), 0 (don’t care), -1
> (no) to this mail to vote.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Antoine
> > _______________________________________________
> > cdi-dev mailing list
> > cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
> >
> > Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the
> code under the Apache License, Version 2 (
> http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas
> provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other
> intellectual property rights inherent in such information.
> > _______________________________________________
> > cdi-dev mailing list
> > cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
> >
> > Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the
> code under the Apache License, Version 2 (
> http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas
> provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other
> intellectual property rights inherent in such information.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cdi-dev mailing list
> cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
>
> Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the
> code under the Apache License, Version 2 (
> http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas
> provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other
> intellectual property rights inherent in such information.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/cdi-dev/attachments/20150604/62694f49/attachment.html