[cdi-dev] CDI SE Google Doc Updated

[John D. Ament]

On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 12:42 PM Antoine Sabot-Durand <
antoine at sabot-durand.net> wrote:

>
>  The CDIProvider serves as a kind of SPI for CDI's static methods to be
> able to call into the implementation. I don't think reusing it also as a
> user-facing code is a good idea. What people suggesting to reuse
> CDIProvider had in mind, I think, was to reuse it as the SPI for talking to
> the CDI implementation instead. That way, the initialize() static method of
> CDIContainer/StartedCDI/whatever we call it can use CDIProvider internally
> to actually start the container.
>
>
> In addition, the current proposal does not make it possible to implement
> parallel container instances.
>
>
>
> We’ll re-discuss that tomorrow at the meeting. If you'd bring an
> alternative proposal that would be great
>

There's a chance I won't be at tomorrow's meeting but I'll follow up either
way.


>
>
> Jozef
>
> On 03/15/2015 05:03 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
>
> HI all,
>
>  Apologies for being a week late on getting this doc together.  I had
> some personal issues pop up after my leg came out of its cast that consumed
> most of my week last week.
>
>  Anywho, I've updated the doc with a summary of what was discussed with
> CDI SE bootstrap support.  You can find that here:
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1LgsGT-AAlrF72Z5pW4xNQiVjUHGUME46ZmB-wwF35Yw/edit?usp=sharing
>
>  There are two minor changes that I made from where we last discussed, as
> when I was putting together code I found some gaps and figured it best to
> fix them here than later.
>
>  1. CDIProvider does not implement AutoCloseable.  Since CDI class
> maintains a reference to the provider, implementing AutoCloseable was not
> adding anything.
>
>  2. I added a method boolean isInitialized() so that the caller can know
> if they need to start the container (or if it's already running).
>
>  Locally, I've also modified the CDI.current() method to use
> getCDIProvider() instead of internally finding the provider since we now
> have a getter.
>
>  One thing I'd like to get feedback on is if calling initialize/shutdown
> in a container should throw IllegalStateException, or probably better to
> throw UnsupportedOperationException when called in EE containers.
>
>  Let me know your thoughts.
>
>  John
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cdi-dev mailing listcdi-dev at lists.jboss.orghttps://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
>
> Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the code under the Apache License, Version 2 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other intellectual property rights inherent in such information.
>
>
>  _______________________________________________
> cdi-dev mailing list
> cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
>
> Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the
> code under the Apache License, Version 2 (
> http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas
> provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other
> intellectual property rights inherent in such information.
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/cdi-dev/attachments/20150316/85805c37/attachment-0001.html